Cognitive analyses of mental workload and human error identification for the improvement of user experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v14i1.1173Keywords:
error prevention, mental workload, user experience, TAFEI, Workload ProfileAbstract
People can sometimes feel overwhelmed when trying to interact with modern technology. Some everyday products have deficient designs which can result in an unsatisfactory experience and even frustration. Additionally, they may produce a mental workload that can induce the user to make mistakes during their usage. The use of techniques for human error identification and mental load assessment in products evaluation and design can provide relevant and useful information to improve the user’s experience. The objective of this work was to propose a methodology for integrating mental workload assessment and human error analysis into product design processes. In this work, mental workload was evaluated during the configuration of wireless earphones using the Workload Profile (WP) technique, and the Task Analysis for Error Identification (TAFEI). Ten users voluntarily participated in the study; their experiences during the use of mobile phone earphones were video recorded. Rating sheets were used to assess mental workload and human errors were identified during the earphones’ setup stage with the mobile phone. The method employed for this research offers higher sensitivity in the assessment of mental workload. It also enables the identification of attention resources that were more frequently used during task completion. Two opportunities for redesign were identified. The first one is related to the light signal detection and the second one to the correct identification of ear tips. Conclusions and recommendations are given for designers to improve the interaction between people and products.
References
Albert, W. and Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. United States of America: Newnes. 320 Pp.
Alferez-Padron, C., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., García-Alcaraz, J., Avelar-Sosa, L., and Realyvasquez-Vargas, A. (2017). Workload assessment and human error identification during the task of taking a plain abdominal radiograph: A sase study. In C. Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (pp. 108-119). United States of America: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_10
Annett, J. (2004). Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA). In N. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas, and H. Hendrick (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods (pp. 329-337). United States of America: CRC Press.
Baber, C. and Stanton, N. (2004). Task Analysis for Error Identification. In N. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas, and H. Hendrick (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods (pp. 378-389). United States of America: CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203489925
Bommer, S. C. and Fendley, M. (2018). A theoretical framework for evaluating mental workload resources in human systems design for manufacturing operations. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 63: 7-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.10.007
Bustamante, N. G., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., Durán, A. A., Ortiz-Nicolás, J. C., and Quiñones, A. R. (2018). Usability Test and Cognitive Analyses during the task of using wireless earphones. In J. Hernández-Arellano, A. Maldonado-Macías, J. Castillo-Martínez, and P. Peinado-Coronado (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Ergonomics and Product Design (pp. 241-263). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 446 Pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5234-5.ch014
Cabero-Almenara, J., Tena, R. R. y Osuna, J. B. (2002). Las personas mayores y las nuevas tecnologías: Una acción en la sociedad de la información. Innovación educativa. (12): 319-337.
Forsythe, C., Liao, H., Trumbo, M. C. S., and Cardona-Rivera, R. E. (2014). Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Systems: Work and Everyday Life. United States of America: CRC Press. 316 Pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b17445
Glendon, A. I., Clarke, S., and McKenna, E. (2016). Human Safety and Risk Management (Second Edition). United States of America: CRC Press. 528 Pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420004687
Haartsen, J. (1998). Bluetooth-The universal radio interface for ad hoc, wireless connectivity. Ericsson review. 3(1): 110-117.
Homburg, C., Schwemmle, M., and Kuehnl, C. (2015). New product design: concept, measurement, and consequences. Journal of Marketing. 79(3): 41-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0199
JBL (s/f). Reflect BT. Workout-ready, Bluetooth®-enabled, in-ear headphones. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.jbl.com/on/demandware.static/-/Sites-masterCatalog_Harman/default/dw16fbdae7/pdfs/ReflectBT_SS_EN.pdf. Fecha de consulta: 12 de noviembre de 2017.
Kuang, S. L., Hu, L., Zhang, S. T., and Gao, D. H. (2009). Applying TAFEI method to orthopaedic robot system’s requirements analysis, In 2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/5339384/proceeding. Fecha de consulta: 14 de noviembre de 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344634
Márquez, L. D. M. (2002). Las personas mayores antelas tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Estudio valorativo. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado. 6(1): 1-9.
Milán, E. G., Salazar, E., Domínguez, E., Iborra, O., de-la-Fuente, J. y de-Córdoba, M. J. (2015). Neurotermografía y termografía psicosomática. Fundación Internacional artecittà, en ReseachGate. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://goo.gl/Af5kov. Fecha de consulta: 14 de octubre de 2017.
Mohammadian, M., Choobineh, A. R., Mostafavi-Nave, A. R., and Hashemi-Nejad, N. (2012). Human errors identification in operation of meat grinder using TAFEI technique. Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology. 1(3): 171-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.johe.1.3.171
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering. San Diego: Morgan Kaufmann. 369 Pp.
Nielsen, J. (2001). Usability Metrics, de Nielsen Norman Group website. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-metrics/. Fecha de consulta: 10 de julio de 2019.
Rubio, S. (2002). Evaluación y medida de la carga de trabajo mental en una tarea de diagnóstico de fallos. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://eprints.ucm.0es/tesis/19911996/S/4/S4002601.pdf. Fecha de consulta: 27 de octubre de 2017.
Rubio, S., Díaz, E. M. y Martín, J. (2001). Aspectos metodológicos de la evaluación subjetiva de la carga mental de trabajo. Archivo de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales. 4(4): 160-168.
Stanton, N. (2006). Hierarchical task analysis: Developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics. 37(1): 55-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.003
Stanton, N. and Baber, C. (2005). Validating task analysis for error identification: reliability and validity of a human error prediction technique. Ergonomics. 48(9): 1097-1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130500219726
Stanton, N., Salmon, P. M., and Rafferty, L. A. (2013). Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. United States of America: Ashgate Publishing. 657 Pp.
Tsang, P. S. and Velazquez, V. L. (1996). Diagnosticity and multidimensional subjective workload ratings. Ergonomics. 39(3): 358-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964470
