University-industry linkage and their interaction channels from the perspective of the academy, the industry and the public policies

Authors

  • Gabriela Sarabia-Altamirano Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Centro Universitario "Lic. Adolfo López Mateos", edificio Centro de Excelencia, primer piso, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México, C.P. 87149.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v10i2.741

Keywords:

university-industry interactions, knowledge transfer, channels of interaction.

Abstract

The university-industry linkage is a high impact factor on the economic development of countries, as it allows the knowledge and technology generated to be marketed for the benefit of society. For many years the indicators of success of these activities were patents, licensing and business generation (spin-off); however, informal channels of interaction have also been identified. Such channels often have more importance than formal interactions given their frequency and retribution. In this work the university-industry linkage, including the effect of public policies, was analyzed from the perspective of the main actors such as industry, university and researchers. The findings show that each actor brings different motivations and barriers that influence the establishment of interactions. Developing countries tend to use channels such as joint research, human capital formation and advisory services because of the context and areas of development that present their industry, as well as the level of research of their universities. Public policies are a key elements to promote the university-industry linkage, and they should be designed based on cultural patterns, types of firms and intensity of research activity in the territory.

 

Archive XML (SciELO)

Author Biography

Gabriela Sarabia-Altamirano, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Centro Universitario "Lic. Adolfo López Mateos", edificio Centro de Excelencia, primer piso, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México, C.P. 87149.

Estudiante del Doctorado de Gestión y Transferencia del Conocimiento en la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas.

Directora de Fomento a la Investigación en el Consejo Tamaulipeco de Ciencia y Tecnología

References

Agüero-Rodríguez, J. C., Tepetla-Montes, J., and Torres-Beristaín, B. (2015). Producción de biocombustibles a partir de la caña en Veracruz, México: perspectivas y riesgos socio-ambientales. CienciaUAT. 9(2): 74-84.

Albornoz, M. y Plaza, L. (2011). Agenda 2011. Temas de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://www.ricyt.org/files/Agenda_RICYT_2011.pdf. Fecha de consulta: 26 de abril de 2015.

Arza, V. and López, A. (2011). Firms linkages with public research organisations in Argentina: Drivers, perceptions and behaviours. Technovation. 31(8): 384–400.

Benner, M. (2011). In search of excellence? An international perspective on governance of university research. En B. Göransson and C. Brundenius(Eds), Universities in transition, insight and innovation in international development (pp. 11–24). New York: Springer.

Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Lafuente, E., and Solé, F. (2013). The pursuit of knowledge transfer activities: An efficiency analysis of spanish universities. Journal of Business Research. 66(10): 2051–2059.

Boardman, P. C. (2009). Government centrality to university–industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy. 38(10): 1505–1516.

Borrás, S. and Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 80(8): 1513–1522.

Castro-Martínez, E. y Vega-Jurado, J. (2009). Las relaciones universidad-entorno socioeconómico en el espacio iberoamericano del conocimiento. Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad. 4(12): 71–81.

D’Este, P. and Iammarino, S. (2010). The spatial profile of university–business research partnerships. Papers in Regional Science. 89(2): 335–350.

D’Este, P. and Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy. 36(9): 1295–1313.

D’Este, P. and Perkmann, M. (2010). Why do academics engage with industry? The entre-preneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 36(3): 316–339.

Dutrénit, G., De-Fuentes, C. D., and Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy. 37(7): 513–526.

Eom, B. Y. and Lee, K. (2010). Determinants of industry-academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Special section on government as entrepreneur. Research Policy. 39(5): 625-639.

Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy. 29(2): 109–123.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: the theory and an application to the semiconductor industry. Mcmillan. 155 Pp.

Freitas, I. M. B., Marques, R. A., and de-Paula, E. M. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy. 42(2):443–453.

Fuentes, C. D. and Dutrénit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy. 41(9): 1666–1682.

Geuna, A. and Muscio, A. (2009). The Governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature. Minerva. 47(1): 93–114.

Giuliani, E., Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., and Rabellotti, R. (2010). Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy. 39(6): 748–761.

Glenna, L. L., Welsh, R., Ervin, D., Lacy, W. B., and Biscotti, D. (2011). Commercial science scientist’s values, and university biotechnology research agendas. Research Policy. 40(7): 957–968.

Guerrero, M. y Urbano, D. (2012). Transferencia de conocimiento y tecnología: Mejores prácticas en las universidades emprendedoras españolas. Gestión y política pública. 21(1): 107–139.

Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2012). Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Research Policy. 41(2): 262–275.

Jaramillo, M. A., Arango, O. G., Cárdenas, L. Z., Llanos, R. A., Pico, J. C., Gutirérrez, M. G., … y Dager, Y. B. (2005). Un análisis de la transferencia y apropiación del conocimiento en la investigación de Universidades Colombianas. Investigación & Desarrollo. 13(1): 128–157.

Kneller, R., Mongeon, M., Cope, J., Garner, C., and Ternouth, P. (2014). Industry–university collaborations in Canada, Japan, the UK and USA–with emphasis on publication freedom and managing the intellectual property lock-up problem. PloS one. 9(3): e90302.

Lai, W. H. (2011). Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations. Journal of Business Research. 64(11): 1218–1223.

Lai, W. H. and Tsai, C. T. (2009). Fuzzy rule–based analysis of firm’s technology transfer in taiwan’s machinery industry. Expert Systems with Applications. 36(10): 12012–12022.

León-Balderrama, J. I., López-Leyva, S. y Sandoval-Godoy, S. A. (2009). Actividades de transferencia del conocimiento de los investigadores académicos en el estado de Sonora. Revista de la educación superior. 38: 85–111.

Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., and Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change. 16(4): 641–655.

Lundvall, B. Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., and Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production innovation and competence building. Research Policy. 31(2): 213–231.

Muscio, A. (2010). What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? evidence from Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 35(2): 181–202.

Plan Estatal de Desarrollo Tamaulipas 2011-2016 (2013). Actualización octubre 2013. Gobierno del Estado de Tamaulipas. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://transparencia.tamaulipas.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/III-PED-TAMAULIPAS-

Actualizaci%C3%B3n-2013-2016 pdf. Fecha de consulta: 26 de abril de 2015.

Plan Nacional de Desarrollo (2013). Gobierno de la República. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://pnd.gob.mx/. Fecha de consulta: 26 de abril de 2015.

Ramos-Vielba, I., Fernández-Esquinas, M., and Espinosa-de-los-Monteros, E. (2010). Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Scientometrics. 84(3): 649–667.

Roessner, D., Bond, J., Okubo, S., and Planting, M. (2013). The economic impact of licensed commercialized inventions originating in university research. Research Policy. 42(1): 23–34.

Thursby, J. G. and Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in University licensing. Management Science. 48(1): 90–104.

Torres, A., Dutrénit, G., Sampedro, J. L., and Becerra, N. (2011). What are the factors driving university–industry linkages in latecomer firms: evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy. 38(1): 31–42.

Published

2016-02-29

How to Cite

Sarabia-Altamirano, G. (2016). University-industry linkage and their interaction channels from the perspective of the academy, the industry and the public policies. CienciaUAT, 10(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v10i2.741

Issue

Section

Social Science